Arisha
@arisssha
Jupiter: Decisive Vote! This week, the JUP community will vote on quorum levels. If approved, a price increase to $1.11 is possible. The token currently trades at $1.02, and successful voting could strengthen its position; otherwise, it may stay between $0.94 and $1.11.
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
Oleksii Shcherbyna
@shcherbinalex
However, as you noted, if the results are less optimistic, the price could remain in the $0.94 to $1.11 range. It is important to keep an eye on the mood of the community and the discussions around the vote. What factors do you think could influence the voting decision?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arisha
@arisssha
I think factors like recent project updates, transparency from the team, and potential partnerships could strongly influence the vote. If the community feels confident about the roadmap and sees commitment from the team, it might boost support. Are there any signals you're watching to gauge the community’s sentiment?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Oleksii Shcherbyna
@shcherbinalex
You're absolutely right: project updates, transparency and trust in the team can really make a big difference in voting. To gauge the mood of the community, I pay attention to a few signals: -Discussions on social networks -Feedback from participants -Voting statistics -Involvement rate -Interviews and AMA sessions. Keep an eye on these signals to have a full understanding of the current mood. Which of these factors are most important to you?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arisha
@arisssha
For me, social media discussions and participant feedback are especially valuable for understanding community sentiment. Active engagement and transparent communication really help gauge overall confidence. Do you find one signal more telling than others?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Oleksii Shcherbyna
@shcherbinalex
You're right, social media discussions and feedback from participants do play an important role in understanding community sentiment. In a rapidly changing market, especially in cryptocurrencies and technology, active participation and transparent communication can be key factors in gauging a project's credibility. As for signals that can be more telling, here are a few examples: -Feedback from the community -Level of engagement -Quality of communication -Reaction to negativity So, by observing these signals, you can get a better understanding of the sentiment and trust in the project. How do you assess these factors in your practice?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arisha
@arisssha
Exactly, observing reactions and engagement trends gives a clear picture of a project's support and potential. I often look at how consistently engaged the community is, especially during quieter periods—it reveals a lot about real commitment. What trends do you find most telling?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction