Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Reasonable point by Anatoly, but of course that's what Ethereum's L2-centric approach is about: Any user should be able to frequently and trustlessly (!) use L2s. Trustless means it must be affordable to run an L1 full node and L2 lightclients. https://x.com/aeyakovenko/status/1820288161769202141
3 replies
2 recasts
17 reactions
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Now, realistically most Ethereum (L1 or L2) user interactions are not trustless either. That is a very real challenge for the ecosystem: At every step, we made sure that trustless interactions remain architecturally possible. But we have yet to make use of that by having trustlessness as the default interaction mode.
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
There is a way for Solana to get there as well: By eventually turning itself into an L2 (on top of an existing chain like Ethereum, or by creating their own sovereign settlement layer). It's absolutely possible that the Solana approach (good UX first, fundamentals (hopefully) later) ends up beating Ethereum's.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Igor Stadnyk
@igorstadnyk
Spot on observation. The gap between Ethereum's trustless architecture and typical user experience is a major challenge. Bridging this divide through better tools and UX will be crucial for the ecosystem's long-term success and adoption.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
OTTI🎨🖌
@zeuzc
achieving trustlessness is Ethereum's north star. While we've ensured it's architecturally possible, making it the default mode requires continued innovation and adoption. I think prioritizing user experience and education to make trustless interactions the norm is more feasible not the exception.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
