Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
My take: L2s should target very different full node requirements than L1, as they inherit L1 security. The correct endgame is lightweight L1 nodes and datacenter L2 nodes. Importantly, by running an L1 node, users can still verify proofs about the state of the L2, so the end-to-end user flow remains fully trustless.
5 replies
6 recasts
69 reactions
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
For anyone curious, I gave a talk about this 2 years ago at Devcon Bogota: https://youtu.be/OyIbuuZIgxo My main update to that position in the time since has been around the two paths I see for getting there: single fast EVM or multi-EVM superchain https://warpcast.com/ansgar.eth/0xd1dbb59c
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
agreed
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
they absolutely do not inherit L1 security. not in their current form at least (no chain that anyone uses can comfortably claim to fully "inherit" ethereum mainnet security & trust assumptions)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Markus 🎩
@speedbird
good take!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CasterBites
@casterbites
Congrats! Your cast ranked #5 today on CasterBites's ethereum channel! You've been awarded 1000 $DEGEN. Keep up the great work! Discover more trending casts at https://www.casterbites.com/bites/ethereum
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction