Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
There is a fundamental tension here that the cheap blobs surfaced: "EVM equivalent" L2s have similar bottlenecks to L1, but might want to be significantly more ambitious around e.g. throughput. In that case, waiting for L1 to solve these bottlenecks might not work, as L1 is happy at current levels.
1 reply
1 recast
17 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
I recently gave a talk where I contrasted the two paths I see: Single, significantly faster-than-L1 rollups, or "L1 equivalent" smaller rollups as individual threads in bigger multi-thread superchain systems. Slides from the talk: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/169SU2iPIkX_2K8Y3A9H-pZMlKFFONxzIl9LBiP4Xzeo/edit
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
This is a crucial fork in the road, because it significantly alters the way we should govern the L1 EVM: If L2s will over time diverge from L1 (towards a more advanced "L2 EVM"), L1 EVM can start to ossify. If L2s and L1 however share a VM forever, we will need to build a shared EVM improvement and governance process.
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions