Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Anatcrypto ⌐◨-◨ 🎩
@anatcrypto.eth
Confusion. That's exactly what I felt when using the /jamfrens app. The second time I bought my post, 90% of the revenue went to the platform. To me, the platform shouldn't make more money than the creator. That's why I prefer Zora over Jams or Uncuts. What do you think about it? Mint Imagine confusion
7 replies
4 recasts
49 reactions
CRYPTO GIRLS 👒 🦈 ↑
@cryptogirls
Yepp love your art 2999 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Solomiya
@solomiya
Very cool art!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Roman 🎤 | 🎩 | 🔵 |
@romansys.eth
If that's true, then I 100% agree, those platforms are useless for creators if they're making more profits than we are. They aren't generating the content, we are
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ksu
@roxyksu
At least in the beginning it shouldn’t work like that to attract more people. Although further shouldn’t but that’s totally on project and their plans. But 90%??? That’s insane
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Juldash
@juldash
Hmm... Of course, platforms have the right to take a percentage of the income, but 90% is like you’ve been robbed. I think that the platform can take no more than 30% of the creator’s income
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
IRINA38 🎩
@panda38
The one who creates, puts his soul into it, often does not think about the reward, but hopes for appreciation of his creativity. And this is expressed, to a greater extent, in audience feedback. Perhaps the platform is counting on this. Of course, it is not decent to give the author such a low percentage. 558 $Degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Megget
@megget
I haven't really delved into Jam yet. I agree that the platform should not take away most of the revenue.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
