there’s a clear lack of conversation around the channels stuff on farcaster.
echo chambers are bad and we do a disservice to farcaster long term if we:

- always agree 100% with what @dwr.eth says and does / dont hold people accountable
- are afraid to speak out about things, specifically the larger accounts here

squatters are not ideal
neither is dan taking channels 
let’s talk about it! what are the pros and cons? why do people here avoid these topics?

What do we do if we want both?

I like this topic because I'm searching for public goods here.

A possible solution is to have a dao decide on case by case basis.
Changeable rules that dictate the outcome of claims and counter claims.
Laws with a margin of nuance that goes to poll.

The 👁️ is the 🚪 to the SOUL

aka AlCatsington

eg: If there was active chat about the state of being bankless, and possible solutions for people.

Would branding supersede language?

There will be coded laws and dissatisfaction as no agency is perfect but I hope we keep trying decentralised governance stuff. 🎯🏗️