fwiw all the people i work with are talking about:

- making smart wallets usable
- driving average L2 fees <$0.01
- bringing L2s to stage 2 decentralization
- enabling L2 interoperability for seamless UX
- making it dead simple to build on L2

ignore the noise, just build.

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

At this point, do we think the main issue of crypto is not having good enough infra, or not having enough good consumer products? My intuition tells me it's the latter, and it's not because we don't have the right infra to build those apps. It's because most of the funding still goes to infra because of that narrative.

/music co-host | Music DAO founder everwave.xyz | ex telco.in founder | writing on web3 & culture https://paragraph.xyz/@alixkun.eth

In an ideal world, yes, but VCs have to make calls as to how to allocate their funds. The Fat Protocol narrative has served its purpose, but it also brainwashed ppl into focusing on infra too much, and it sometimes feel like a lot of ppl are trapped into thinking we *still* have an infra pb regarding mass adoption.