Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
I said this three months ago - Macron's way was increasing instability. He should've let the regular process take its course and let the winner of the election form the government. Instead he did a soft coup. A liberal blocking the left and causing far right rise. A tale as old as time. https://warpcast.com/chainleft/0x41f3b06f
12 replies
2 recasts
14 reactions
alixkun🟣🎩🍡
@alixkun
What you seem to fail to understand is that, had Macron put a left prime minister in power, the government would not have lasted 3 months like this one, but 3 days. The situation is structurally fucked in France until next year summer, even Macron resigning and launching a new presidential elections wouldnt change shit.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
You are speculating. NPF wasn't given a chance. Centrists were. And they fucked it up, that's just what happened.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alixkun🟣🎩🍡
@alixkun
Speculating? Yeah that's really a wild speculation to say that liberals and far right would censor an NPF government. Borderline science fiction! 🤯
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
Scenario 1: Given them a chance to negotiate as the regular process has always been. If they succeed in forming, great. If they fail, then do what you want to do. Scenario 2: Don't give them a chance, diverge from the regular process, disfranchise them in narrative, and push a technocrat to form government, let far right rise, prove Chainleft right. 🤷🏽♂️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alixkun🟣🎩🍡
@alixkun
This doesn't work, because each of the three block is fake negotiating. NPF, Liberals & Far Right are all pretending to negotiate, but it's always within the boarders of their ideology. Ideology that is fundamentally rejected by the 2 other blocks systematically. None of the 3 blocks is willing to give up on ideology and show the slightest agreement with one of the other block, because that would be seen as compromission, meaning sacrificing their chances for the next presidential elections. They would then be seen as sellout, and fail to get popular votes. believe me, this is EXACTLY what's happening right now, nothing more, nothing less.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
Centrists have more wiggle room there. IMHO if NPF had the charge to negotiate, centrists could side with them and wouldn't be seen as hypocrites. But mine here is also a speculation ofc. NPF could have been given a chance, and wasn't given in the end. That chance was given to less populist center, and they had to negotiate with populists who has less wiggle room because they are populists. And it didn't work. As expected. I don't disagree it's tough, but I think NPF had more probability to solve it. We now know centrist solution doesn't / didn't work at least.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction