Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
IMO a fixed $25 to create a channel is probably far *below* the socially optimal price. Many were squatted in an early speculative land grab and are now abandoned. It's much easier to create a new one than commit to curating it and building a community over the long term. Throwing them onchain and letting Coasean bargaining sort it out seems reckless until the concept can outcompete "squat, gamble, and speculate."
6 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
Matthew
@matthew
counter point: what social network charges you to make a community? isn't the namespace centralized anyway?
2 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
Alexander White
@alexwhite9777
Gm
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction