Content
@
https://uniswap.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam
@rhynotic
My @uniswap v4 hook (btcacc.com) is currently ranked #4 in TVL and #3 in volume, but I don't really think it makes sense spending time/energy creating more projects with v4 hooks until Uniswap has better support for them. - NO ONE routes through the pools. Uniswap's API / Frontend doesn't even route through pools with custom hooks that aren't allowlisted, same with 0x / Relay. Insane that they'd spend years creating this and not have support for small projects day 1, stifling any experimentation. - They should pay whatever the cost (or engineering resources) is to get Dexscreener / Dextools / other charting sites to integrate (or better yet, chart themselves) I have a lot of onchain game ideas I want to make with hooks, but creating them just to get no volume due to the issues above makes me hesitant. That being said, getting $500k volume and $250k TVL even with the above issues makes me think I'm creating in the right direction.
8 replies
3 recasts
12 reactions
agusti
@bleu.eth
@haydenzadams can you fix this guys! would love to experiment with v4 hooks but without these fixed seems futile!
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
agusti
@bleu.eth
@matchaxyz does 0x / relay plan to support v4 hooks? whats the roadmap here
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
alexfertel.eth
@alexfertel
our router is not whitelisted, otherwise we would have automatically supported it
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Adam
@rhynotic
Awesome so I just need to whitelist the router? Is it 0x0000000000001ff3684f28c67538d4d072c22734?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
alexfertel.eth
@alexfertel
yeah, you also need to whitelist these two, since they are different flows Note that it may take some time for our system to start taking your hooked pools into account https://basescan.org/address/0x5C9bdC801a600c006c388FC032dCb27355154cC9 https://basescan.org/address/0xFb33F10738D6e83A049678C1fcB9eb8b78d1417F
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
