Jason Goldberg βοΈ π
@betashop.eth
π Big Updates to the Moxie-Based Rewards Program! π We just upgraded our ranking model to reward real engagement and prevent gaming the system. Hereβs the TL;DR: β Total USD spent and average transaction value now carry more weight β bigger, meaningful transactions count more than tiny spam trades. β Transaction count no longer scales linearly β users farming thousands of small transactions wonβt rank higher just from volume. β Gas usage is factored in but isnβt rewarded inefficiently β high spenders benefit, but wasteful spending no longer dominates. β Moxie Score still plays a major role, but with diminishing returns at the high end β a high score is still a major advantage, but raw spending and transaction quality matter more. This means better incentives, fairer competition, and higher-quality rewards for the Moxie economy. π the dune dashboards is updated already https://dune.com/queries/4544813 you'll see this reflected on Moxie for today once the scores update
17 replies
16 recasts
58 reactions
alexesc π©
@alexescd.eth
Suppose 0.01 is the gas and 10 is transaction usd 10x0.01 + 10x0.01 + 10x0.01 = 30x0.01 Why 30x0.01 has more weight than the others?. We do transactions when we see an opportunity. That's trading. This is what we need. Activity in Base
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alexesc π©
@alexescd.eth
at the beginning yes, because we measured only gas, but now we measure the usdc transaction. Why many small transactions give more score than one large, in the previous dune?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction