I know we’re doing something right with Season 2’s point scoring when I can see quality creators like @eirrann.eth @leeknowlton.eth @tormential @dirtykumquats @fercaggiano @degenfans and @drivenbyboredom in the top 20.

Quality focused explore tab coming 🔜

Dom. Dark artist. 🖤 /alfafrens analyst 🖤 Creating emotionally evocative dark art as a means of self-discovery. 🖤 /zeroone-fam host 🖤#AIartist

A Collection of Unwashed Genderless Fruit.
Each one is unique, posed for a photo, then discarded after being used. https://www.dirtykumquats.com

/dirtykumquats

Wanna be the very best. Building @moxiescout. ゼニゼニ 



I know we’re doing something right with Season 2’s point scoring when I can see quality creators like @eirrann.eth @zeni.eth @tormential @dirtykumquats @fercaggiano @degenfans and @drivenbyboredom in the top 20.

Quality focused explore tab coming 🔜

head of product @superfluid @alfafrens @superboring

vijay.info

I don't feel I deserve to be in the position I'm in because I disagree with this system of measuring quality. I don't think I'm worthy of one of the top spots, as the system isn't fair. The subscription app should be able to function on its own without someone qualifying you. If you're good at creating exclusive content, that will translate into subscribers. But having someone judge your content among so much diversity doesn't seem right to me. It's like a video app rating you based on the content you offer. It's not a good method. If you're good, subscribers will come.

Ok Vijay, I understand your position in saying that it's an automatic system. That makes sense. But it would be helpful to know if it's related to quality, so we can all work on improving it. It's been favoring me so far, but others might be feeling discouraged. In any case, I trust you guys completely to do what's right.

Quality isn’t directly judged, there are a series of hidden scoring mechanisms which are objective and automatic. Just to clarify that bit!