Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ariah Klages-Mundt pfp
Ariah Klages-Mundt
@aklamun
Some criticisms of Ethena seem misplaced once you appreciate the category distinction of what it is / isn't. It is: āœ… A strategy that takes on certain high risks for possibly high variable yield. It isn't: āŒ Designed to be a resilient stablecoin (e.g., compare to @gyroscope design) or a stable yield source.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ariah Klages-Mundt pfp
Ariah Klages-Mundt
@aklamun
And that's ok. As a strategy, it makes general sense and isn't a Terra. It shouldn't be expected to always be stable and profitable. And diversity of strategies is a good thing.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ariah Klages-Mundt pfp
Ariah Klages-Mundt
@aklamun
You can criticize Ethena for not having all sorts of fallback mechanisms in case rates go negative for too long, LSTs depeg, and various other things (counterparty risk, execution, forced settlement etc). But if you want these things, you should really be using @gyroscope, which does focus on resilient mechanisms.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction