dune

I don’t think the data on clanker vs pdf is right

from my understanding it’s comparing all clanker volume, to just pdf bonding curve volume

clanker has been a resounding success but that metric feels misleading

unless I’m just totally wrong? which would be ideal

Thanks for the feedback. We use a processed table named dex_solana.trades to calculate the volume of pumpfun. After digging into the logic I find it refers to another table of pumpfun which already consider the bonding_curve part.

Here’s the logic of the table. You can verify on github and shout out to @dune.eth for providing such a helpful table.

Thanks for the feedback. We use a processed table named dex_solana.trades to calculate the volume of pumpfun. After digging into the logic I find it refers to another table of pumpfun which already consider the bonding_curve part.

Here’s the logic of the table. You can verify on github and shout out to @dune.eth for providing such a helpful table.

https://github.com/duneanalytics/spellbook/blob/main/dbt_subprojects/solana/models/_sector/dex/pumpdotfun/solana/pumpdotfun_solana_base_trades.sql

Owner of /ordinals and /berachain
Data lead at @0xhoneyjar