Don’t think the Russian revisionist pomp about victory over the Nazis in WW2 is fooling anyone, considering they started it in an alliance with the them to begin with - then illegally annexed and occupied most of Eastern Europe for decades afterwards.

Wut? The soviet union litterally captured Berlin, lmfao every historian puts the weight of the allies victory on the soviet union, this is max level revisionism

And as I said, every year they act like they didn’t start it all via a secret alliance with the Nazis

You are completely misunderstanding me and I’m not having this extremely dumb debate.

Funny you don't complain about the Munich agreement?

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, was not an alliance it was a non aggression pact with theoretical division of land, the Munich agreement litterally gave land to Hitler. And again lmfao the soviet union captured Berlin and most even mainstream historians credit them for being the driving force to victory in ww2