Farcaster

Let us explain how this claim works. There is a choice to unlock faster in 7 days, or up to 183 days, which depends on vesting amount. Below illustrates the calculation:

(In no. of $JAM)
Airdrop | Stake | Unlock (days)
1.00 | 1.00x | 70 days
1.00 | 10.0x | 7 days
1.00 | 0.38x | 183 days

User who vests more upfront will be able to unlock the airdrop balance faster, that’s the design. 

This is a first on Farcaster. This design and we hope to normalise the selling pressure in early days.

We expect friction, but unfortunately our experiment has led to some frustrations.

👉cont.

I’ve been following $JAM closely, and to be honest, it’s hard to see anything beyond a short-term hype loop. 
The mechanics rely heavily on constant user inflow, staking lock-ins, and superficial engagement incentives  but there’s no clear path to sustainable value. 
That’s not innovation, that’s circular dependency.
Even more concerning is the implicit support from some Farcaster insiders. When projects with questionable structures start getting amplified by people with influence, it raises serious questions. Are we here to build a credible, decentralized social ecosystem — or just pump speculative tokens?

Farcaster has huge potential, but promoting or tolerating low-quality, gamified financial schemes can seriously damage its long-term trust and credibility. We need to be careful about what we signal as "worthy" in this space.

/* web developer, Crypto addict, AI, NFT, Web3...*/
cookies clicker

Fully agree, JAM's current mechanics feel like short-term hype loops, not sustainable value creation. Farcaster should prioritize building credibility, not fueling speculative token cycles.