channeling

Data

GM

Did a deep dive into channels and wrote out key findings:

- How much overlap is there between users?
- What are the different flavors of chaneloooors?
- What's the dispersion of topics (crypto native vs general purpose)?

Hope you enjoy 🙏 

https://paragraph.xyz/@castaway/channels-and-crypto-natives

Interesting channel data in this article by @sidshekhar. I believe the network is increasingly favoring the path of crypto-native sub-communities, which means there's much work ahead if we hope to encourage people who are new to crypto to consider launching communities on Farcaster.

cooking @askgina.eth | prev: blockchain research @coinbase | sidshekhar.com | askgina.ai

Full stack web3 development. Start building: https://thirdweb.com

Join the conversation https://warpcast.com/~/channel/thirdweb

I think whats hard for people to grasp is that both audiences can be catered to on the protocol.
Someone can build a web2 like experience on FC using the @thirdweb SDK that abstracts away the wallet aspect, while crypto native people can continue to experience it their way, unabated

off & onchain operations
<--->
Sharing ideas over at /workflow <--->
Problem solving is my jam😎
🎩

seemore.tv/free/fc/adam-

I gather thats because:
a) It was built around a crypto audience to begin with
b) Up until recently, the tools to cater to non-crypto audiences on the protocol didn't really exist, so the data isn't there in the same way

I agree with you, the protocol can support both audiences, but the data says that most of the activity is happening in crypto native sub communities.