Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

typeof.eth 🔵 pfp
typeof.eth 🔵
@typeof.eth
This is a very bad look for Sony's L2 (censoring transactions via its sequencer), but also props to Superchain for having the foresight to prevent that. Also, @/Sony why are you here if you don't care about crypto? https://x.com/gauthamzzz/status/1879245705782735301
4 replies
3 recasts
15 reactions

typeof.eth 🔵 pfp
typeof.eth 🔵
@typeof.eth
FWIW, this is a pretty bad UX and you should probably not build on Sony's L2
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

accountless pfp
accountless
@accountless.eth
i saw mixed thoughts ab this (i’m ambivalent). some folks said it’s fair for them to do so, since it’s their centralized company’s chain. i also saw, one benefit bc of OP stack was users could still go through l1 and not be censored.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

typeof.eth 🔵 pfp
typeof.eth 🔵
@typeof.eth
For me it’s like why launch an L2 or even be in crypto if they’re gonna censor in a way that’s not even really justified. They’re allowed to do that, I guess, and we can just not use it 🤷‍♂️
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions