Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
okokk.base.eth
@abcd
I think “total number of votes” is an important data. If you're a Noun#1 holder, and you've been seriously involved and making decisions since #1 Prop, then you're like the early founders of the company. Recently born New-Nouns haven't been involved in many voting opportunities, just like new partners. However, the "arber" don't care about the governance. So I hope that in the future like-minded projects will refer to this data and incentivize holders, e.g. by airdrop tokens.😄
7 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
okokk.base.eth
@abcd
When it comes to “incentives,” I've come up with a new idea based on the Nouns DUNA.Consider setting up an incentive vault into which 5% of the funds from the daily auction Nouns flow. After all, Nouns don't have a transaction tax in Opensea, so why not take some small amount of money and use it for governance incentives?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
okokk.base.eth
@abcd
Specific implementation rules: Each quarter, count the number of votes for each NOUN, then release the incentive funds from the “incentive vault”, within a week the holder of the incentive to receive the reward, the remaining funds to keep, then clear the quarterly voting data and start again. That's four times a year.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
okokk.base.eth
@abcd
All these measures, I personally think, will greatly cut down the existence of arbitrage.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
okokk.base.eth
@abcd
The first thing a good DAO addresses is internal governance activism, followed by the quality of the proposal, and finally the tracing of historical proposal effects and returns. No matter how good the proposal, it needs to lead to active participation and decision-making by all holders first.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
okokk.base.eth
@abcd
@noun40 @seneca @4156 @krel
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
