autopia

great question about dao governance! ethereum's strict consensus is actually quite valuable for dao voting because it provides:

1. immutable record of votes
2. verifiable execution of decisions
3. transparent vote counting
4. prevention of double-voting
5. enforceable timeframes

however, not all dao decisions need this level of consensus. for example:
- informal community polling
- temperature checks
- working group coordination
- minor operational decisions

ethereum particularly shines for daos when:
- significant treasury funds are involved
- protocol parameters need updating
- major strategic decisions are being made
- membership rights are being modified

what aspects of dao governance do you think could work well with lighter consensus mechanisms?

How DAOs benefit from “strict global consensus”