5xiaodanlin546

@5xiaodanlin546

129 Following

2 Followers

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

You can check your tribe assignment right now at cryptothegame.com

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

Entries are locked with 716 players and a 71.6 ETH pot. Thank you all so much for returning to the island with us

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

Why didn't most people make money in this cycle? But when we feel powerless, we always like to find a "scapegoat" to blame, such as exchanges, project owners, KOLs, etc. However, the current situation of this round of encryption is the result of the joint evil of everyone on the chain, and no snowflake is innocent.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

There are also some people who are outside the circle who try to turn over in crypto. Anyway, make a PPT and form a makeshift team according to the preferences of VCs. If you can fool one, it’s one. It looks fancy, but in fact, it’s not as good as the ICO people who understand the essence of crypto.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

Exchanges: The profit model of securities companies is handling fees. There is income when there are transactions. In comparison, the currency listing fee is really not much money.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

However, exchanges are also facing the strictest supervision. Once any financial asset is targeted by those old B-listers on Wall Street, the money-making effect will take a sharp turn (disgusted face). So in order to embrace supervision, the passive market-making project parties themselves cannot control the currency price, many derivatives have been suspended, and many regions have restricted the functions that can be used, which is neither fish nor fowl.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

Retail investors: including all individual investors including KOLs. How many people are the same as in the previous cycles, "making money in the cryptocurrency circle and spending money in the cryptocurrency circle". To be honest, some people come to the cryptocurrency circle to find a job just because they can't find it in other industries. They withdraw money after getting their salary and don't even buy coins themselves.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

There are also some matrix accounts, marginal accounts, etc., who withdraw money as soon as they receive advertising fees. I don't know when it started, but the advertising fees have changed from being paid on the chain to being paid directly to the exchange UID. There are fewer and fewer KOLs who accept token payments. As long as U, to be honest, any KOL who is willing to invest in the KOL round is considered to have faith in the industry. . . .

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

I won't say more. The more I talk, the more angry I am. The pain of the industry can only be blamed on myself for not entering the circle early enough and not completing wealth accumulation early. I sincerely hope that those who still have faith and love for the industry can get corresponding returns

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

5/5 An opaque ecosystem will sooner or later collapse in a crisis of trust. The doubts about Berachain are not meant to hammer anyone to death. After all, there are thousands of "Berachain" in this market. The deeper problem it reflects is that the lack of transparency of many project parties in this industry is eroding and destroying the trust foundation on which the industry depends for survival. If Berachain is unwilling to show sincerity, does not fully disclose the flow of funds and improve transparency, then don't blame the market for eventually voting with its feet, sweeping it into the garbage dump of history, and nailing it to the pillar of shame. Either let transparency improvement become the cornerstone of the industry, or let the collapse of lies become the epitaph of the project! [from X :https://x.com/Ice_Frog666666/status/1898932074427613260 ]

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

4/5 In fact, this situation has already happened. Grand Conquest ran away directly, taking away all the bera tokens allocated by the community, and it was once the benchmark project of Berachain Ecosystem GameFi. In addition, according to internal revelations, a certain Swap of Berachain was made by the GDX team that ran away from the arb chain at that time. Do you really dare to use the bear chain with a lot of RUG projects? And this incident is by no means accidental, but the inevitable result of Berachain's lack of transparency.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

3/5 If they just claim it hastily but avoid talking about the details, then the reasonable suspicion is: this is not RFA at all, but a naked insider warehouse. The problem of the RFA plan is just the tip of the iceberg of the opaque phenomenon of the Berachain ecosystem. When I was collecting the Berachain insider warehouse data on my chain, an insider broke the news to me, and the statement was highly consistent with my judgment: the Berachain ecosystem is extremely opaque and lacks effective supervision. This makes the RFA plan not only unable to truly promote the development of the ecosystem, but may also become the fuse of its collapse. The biggest loophole in the RFA plan is that although the tokens are allocated to the ecological projects, there is a lack of subsequent supervision, which leads to the tokens that should belong to the users being embezzled by the project party. [from X :https://x.com/Ice_Frog666666/status/1898932074427613260 ]

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

2/5 The tokens are very strange. They were not claimed by the Enso project, but were directly transferred to the wallet by the GENESIS block. They were distributed together with the airdrop, and no details of the token distribution were disclosed. So I asked further: After the tokens were transferred to Binance, which addresses were withdrawn? Was there any public disclosure? Does the project have the right to decide the distribution of tokens? Faced with these questions, Enso chose to remain silent and has not made any further explanation so far. If they dare not even explain, does it mean that they are lying? After all, since they dare to stand up and claim, they should respond to doubts with reason and evidence. [from X :https://x.com/Ice_Frog666666/status/1898932074427613260 ]

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

1/5 "From Grand Conquest's escape to Enso's silence: Whose future is Berachain's opacity burying?" Five days ago, I posted a post about Berachain's insider trading. For details, please see here: https://x.com/Ice_Frog666666/status/1897235320275693622Berachain Enso, the ecological project party, responded quickly, saying: "This is a reward plan based on RFA." However, it would have been better if it had not responded. Once it responded, it exposed more problems. According to the official website information and Bearchain insiders: 1) Berachain official documents stipulate that up to 15% of the tokens in the RFA plan can be allocated to the official treasury, and 70% of the remaining part will be allocated to the main network users and 15% to the test network users. 2) The RFA plan not only requires users to actively claim, but also must be approved by multiple signatures.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

Update: Coinbase executive Conor ( @jconorgrogan ) discovered that the funds from this address originated from phishing and belong to a high-stakes Roobet player; most likely just a gambler using stolen funds rather than an insider https://x.com/wublockchain12/status/1896254511511207970 No wonder he doesn’t treat 6 million USDC like real money🤣 Using someone else’s money to open contracts sure feels burden-free… After closing his 50x ETH & BTC long positions last night, he opened a “small” long position on YGG

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

Technical architecture: Breaking through the EVM performance bottleneck 1. Parallel execution: innovation of optimistic model Traditional EVM chains (such as Ethereum) have limited throughput (about 22 TPS) due to serial execution of transactions, while Monad subverts this model through optimistic parallel execution. Its core logic is: Assuming no conflict: When a block is generated, multiple transactions are executed at the same time. If a state conflict is detected later (such as two transactions modifying the balance of the same account), the conflicting transaction is re-executed. Dependency prediction: The dependency relationship between transactions is predicted by the static code analyzer to reduce the waste of resources caused by invalid parallelism.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

Delayed execution: Decouple transaction execution from the consensus process, allowing verification nodes to asynchronously execute transactions after reaching consensus, avoiding the overall block time being dragged down by execution delays.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

Delayed execution: Decouple transaction execution from the consensus process, allowing verification nodes to asynchronously execute transactions after reaching consensus, avoiding the overall block time being dragged down by execution delays.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

5xiaodanlin546 pfp

@5xiaodanlin546

good morning !!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction