Warpcast

Farcaster

If you had the power in the decision-making circle of Warpcast or (Farcaster):

 Which feature would you modify and why?

My answer: 
1- I would review the spam level algorithm and, out of respect for users, leave open the possibility of being wrong and the path to protesting it. 

2- To encourage more and better quality activity, I would not limit the benefits to only level 2s so that there is motivation and enthusiasm.

 3- I would use  onchain measures to verify that they are not robots.

1- I think that the Warpex platform gives more priority to text content is a very negative point and it should include all generated content.
2- Video publishing is blocked for level 1 spam users and this is also very annoying because many of us have valuable video content.
3- Depriving users of a series of benefits simply because of the level of spam that cannot be measured is a bit annoying.
What do you think?

Amateur nature photographer 
Travel & Nature Lover also web3 lover :)

Totally agree — limiting features based on vague “spam levels” feels unfair.
Valuable content comes in all formats, not just text.
Warpex should be more transparent and inclusive if it wants creators to stick around.