🏴

I believe this needs to be considered seriously. As @xinalan proposed, we could use the remaining treasury to save our data to ensure its longevity.  These data and information are the history and memories of bDAO contributors and they are valuable and priceless for future potential research and investigation.

I believe this needs to be considered seriously. As @xinalan proposed, we could use the remaining treasury to save our data to ensure its longevity.  These data and information are the history and memories of bDAO contributors and they are valuable and priceless for future potential research and investigation. 
https://forum.bankless.community/t/preserve-our-precious-bdao-data/10695

Onchain Economics Rsearcher& Writer | Web: http://183aaros.notion.site | Building 🔵📈 /onchainomics 🔴OPCN | 🏴 BanklessDAO Alum | INTP

Startup artist seeking inspiration.  Champion of /bcard

Hmm, I'm not sure about this. If this is a 'must-trade-off' situation, then I think the survival of the DAO should take priority. Your claim in the forum is clear and straightforward.

IMO this is still worth being aware of. Some guilds and departments may not be active these days, but the information and data are important for FUTURE analysis and research on DAO governance. 

My point is, this is important for future contributors as well. This call to action may not directly relate to the fund, as you have explained in the forum, but people in the DAO should take notice, and take action.

I’m sorry, are you saying the words of past contributors are more important than funding future contributions?