| founder // angel // official cat @
| premia // 21e8 // eden studio

Imagine lying to everyone who bought your NFT's, and purposefully using phrases like AI and AGI to clickbait people, and take advantage of ignorance on what AI actually is for personal gain.

That's the point. Everything about the AI capabilities in that paper are 100% BS.

imagine knowing nothing about those involved w/ gaias and making these assumptions…

study ex-twitter employees behavior on social media

The gaias AGI theory does not hold water...using some gambling degen's data to train a model will not succeed at producing AGI where Google, Anthropic, DARPA, Meta and many others with near infinite resources have failed.
What is mildly interesting is 🧵 👇

I don't know how exactly the pets and non-pets interact here, seems like a big value driver for pets and no one else, but we'll see. I like the idea of a non-owner who is skilled at these games being recruited by owners to train their models

this bit also does not make sense "The platform operates on blockchain technology, ensuring fair, transparent, and secure computation. " 
There just isn't enough compute on chain to do this, period

...the bit about using Q-learning to train AI players at specific games and gambling on the AI agents play. This could be fun, from a technical perspective could actually work, and I hope creates a market for skilled gamers to sell their data to AI trainers

You could use a q-learning approach to train an agent on a racing game by using human players as input, but it would only be good at that specific game

basically, but nothing about that data will be used to train anything that would be anywhere remotely close to anything AGI, let alone narrow AI.