Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
what conclusions or hypotheses do you see when you look at this chart? from a recent study published in the Lancet: thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01495-8/fulltext
26 replies
18 recasts
65 reactions

Tony pfp
Tony
@0xt0ny
They seem to have a narrative, and have segmented the US data only, in order to tell their story. I wonder how minorities fare in other countries? Does this control for people spending most or all of their lives in the country they were measured in? Like almost all US population studies, it comes down to higher socioeconomic classes doing better, and then gets turned into a racial disparity bc that's how the US breaks down. what conclusions did you come to?
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
no, they didn’t account for how long they’ve been in those countries. one note: if they included lifespan for more Asian countries, you’d see that Asian Americans have longer lifespans than the majority of Asian countries (China, India, Singapore, South Korea, etc.)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

J. Valeska πŸ¦ŠπŸŽ©πŸ«‚  pfp
J. Valeska πŸ¦ŠπŸŽ©πŸ«‚
@jvaleska.eth
feels like that.. just take the average of ALL americans and compare
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pastel ← leo κ“½κ“½) pfp
pastel ← leo κ“½κ“½)
@leopastel
a narrative is beneficial if it’s backed by hard data
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction