Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Credible neutrality is the difference between the high seas and Bob's waterpark. Technology ups the stakes. We have Twitter for public debate, the App Store for software, YouTube, Wikipedia, & more--critical, global, billion-person infrastructure that's nonetheless in the "waterpark" category. We're here to fix it.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Here's a good example of what happens when you don't have credible neutrality. Bob's waterpark, Bob's rules. https://twitter.com/CharliePryor/status/1766531665898188981
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
In this case, there's a twist: Community Notes is public data, public algorithm. (Doing more than all the other web2 socials!) @bountybot $100 USDC bounty to download the data, run the algo & either prove or disprove the claim that Elon overrode it to remove a correct note from his post.
5 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
We should just crowdfund a bounty toward a GUI that lets you run the algorithm on any note/tweet, and see how its helpfulness score and threshold changes in real time. I'd certainly donate to support such a thing if it exists.
6 replies
8 recasts
82 reactions
Petra ⊙
@0xpetra
This seems super useful! We could add a prediction market to the tweets in which it makes sense. Might play around with this next week.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nico Gallardo 🍄
@nicnode
lfg petra!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
