mert pfp
mert
@0xmert
guys stop listing 6 separate problems that you're solving in your pitchdeck you are not solving 6 separate problems, and you do not have a 100B TAM first, solve 1 *real* problem *extremely* well you are diluting your message and showing you have no focus
7 replies
2 recasts
54 reactions

eunikaπŸ’ pfp
eunikaπŸ’
@eunika.eth
Or stop writing problems like this: unverifiable transactions and unreconciled security vulnerabilities lead to loss of decentralization and negatively distributed yield
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Montez pfp
Montez
@montez
I’m working on a pitch deck for a web3 CAD protocol I’m building (e.g. @objects). Not sure if my message is strong. Would you be open to give feedback?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gigi pfp
Gigi
@gigimp1.eth
Disagree - your USP should be zoomed in on solving a specific need that the market has yet to discover (if the market fit is too high you’re too late). One product can address multiple problems, but your positioning should focus on solving 1 problem well.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𝚣𝚘𝚣 🎩 pfp
𝚣𝚘𝚣 🎩
@zoz.eth
I like to add no problems but a layer 4 blockchain looking for them
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Acid pfp
Acid
@0xacid
If you're building a 2sided market, is solving 1 thing for just 1 side sufficient?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wahoo.eth 🎩✨ pfp
wahoo.eth 🎩✨
@wahoo
true. good advice 113✨
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Donh 🎩 Ⓜ️ pfp
Donh 🎩 Ⓜ️
@dih
Got 99 problems but a ....
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction