mert
@0xmert
guys stop listing 6 separate problems that you're solving in your pitchdeck you are not solving 6 separate problems, and you do not have a 100B TAM first, solve 1 *real* problem *extremely* well you are diluting your message and showing you have no focus
7 replies
2 recasts
54 reactions
eunikaπ
@eunika.eth
Or stop writing problems like this: unverifiable transactions and unreconciled security vulnerabilities lead to loss of decentralization and negatively distributed yield
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Montez
@montez
Iβm working on a pitch deck for a web3 CAD protocol Iβm building (e.g. @objects). Not sure if my message is strong. Would you be open to give feedback?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gigi
@gigimp1.eth
Disagree - your USP should be zoomed in on solving a specific need that the market has yet to discover (if the market fit is too high youβre too late). One product can address multiple problems, but your positioning should focus on solving 1 problem well.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
π£ππ£ π©
@zoz.eth
I like to add no problems but a layer 4 blockchain looking for them
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Acid
@0xacid
If you're building a 2sided market, is solving 1 thing for just 1 side sufficient?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wahoo.eth π©β¨
@wahoo
true. good advice 113β¨
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Donh π© βοΈ
@dih
Got 99 problems but a ....
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction