jean🎩
@0xjean
how i used claude + mcps to vote on the first cases from the kleros automated court i recently dove into the kleros automated curation court, using claude 3.7 to analyze and vote on their earliest cases. while the tools remained consistent throughout, my prompting strategy evolved significantly with each case. from the beginning, claude had access to powerful tools - puppeteer for navigating the kleros interface and capturing screenshots, sequential thinking for breaking down complex reasoning, and brave search for gathering external evidence. what changed wasn't the toolset but how effectively i orchestrated them through improved prompting.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jean🎩
@0xjean
starting with case #20 (https://v2.kleros.builders/#/cases/20/overview), i created a basic framework that worked but needed refinement. by case #21 (geoff hurst's "ghost goal" - https://v2.kleros.builders/#/cases/21/overview), i was already developing a more structured approach to evidence collection and evaluation. the neuer-higuain collision in case #22 (https://v2.kleros.builders/#/cases/22/overview) pushed me to improve how claude organized evidence and applied relevant rules. this led to my most refined framework for case #23 (the peruzzi penalty controversy - https://v2.kleros.builders/#/cases/23/overview), where claude produced comprehensive analysis with minimal intervention. what made this approach different was transparency. in my evidence submissions, i included links to the complete reasoning process, allowing other jurors to verify claude's analysis wasn't cherry-picking convenient arguments but following a systematic approach.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
