Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zero Weight
@zeroweight
Nouns Proposal 546: Fund Retroactive Rounds via Rounds.wtf Reply with +for, +against, or +abstain and a reason to control 3 /nouns votes. Read prop → https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/546
7 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
0xishal
@0xishal
+abstain I'm actually a prop.house supporter and because it really is a mini onchain prop. Very different market with rounds. Very hopeful for prop.house to continue and rounds will also exist.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
