Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@0xidk
all of these pay to engage/hyper financialized social products (@rodeodotclub, @kiosk, @moxie.eth, @zora app, are ngmi) social already struggles with the power law where 90%+ people don’t engage at all and here you are putting up a fucking paywall to engage lmao NO ONE WANTS OR NEEDS TO PAY TO LIKE OR COMMENT ON ANYONE’S POST NOT EVERYTHING ON SOCIAL HAS TO BE A FUCKING MICROTRANSACTION STOP FINANCIALIZING MY GENUINE ATTEMPTS AT CONNECTION GDI you might get initial traction in the crypto community but if you believe you’ll gain the larger general population with these tactics, you passed delusional a while ago ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
I agree with the sentiment although I'm not entirely sure Moxie fits the bill. It's not financial gating it's just financial rewards on engagement. Although plenty of people will build those gates, its not a built-in feature.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Garrett
@garrett
financialization should be a secondary feature in social products/apps, not the primary one
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
