Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gilbert pfp
gilbert
@0xgib
Security question: If deploying a contract can take 100-1000x transactions, then how does upgrading a contract work for that same number of transactions? Will the contract still function? As its old version? Or do you upload to a buffer and switch to it in 1 tx instead?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
I believe it's the latter, you upload it into storage buffers then swap the pointer in the final transaction.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

gilbert pfp
gilbert
@0xgib
That would be the sensible option, right? Still trying to find docs on it Might have to dig into the source code
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

curiousapple pfp
curiousapple
@curiousapple
hmm is it enough tho ? if a upgrade is taking multiple transactions and pointer is redirected in end, can't a malicious actor see whats being updated and exploit before the patch is applied ? you also need pause function to pause it before, no ?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

gilbert pfp
gilbert
@0xgib
It would be raw bytecode, so the attacker would need to be able to statically analyze it in a short amount of time. Sounds possible in theory, but not sure to what extent since txs are much faster in Solana
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
From a security perspective, this is certainly not worse than a DAO having to pass governance to upgrade a vulnerable contract. The reality is that 99% of upgrades are not about fixing bugs, but rather about introducing new bugs^Werr, new features!
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction