ted (not lasso)
@ted
endless coins drive sequencer fees much more than 1:1 or limited edition NFTs, btw âshow me the incentive and Iâll show you the outcomeâ
9 replies
3 recasts
79 reactions
0xen đ©
@0xen
some of these are going to need to have some real number-go-up techmology otherwise nobody will bother. Right now the game isnât much fun because there are no stakes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
what do you mean?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xen đ©
@0xen
None of these zora/base alliance coins have captured the broader crypto worldâs imagination. Public perception is they fizzle always. At some point there will have to be some runners otherwise nobody will mess with it. I know theyâre trying to change public perception, â1k is a lot actuallyâ but that comes out to like pennies for the artist and not a single trader is in crypto for 1k market caps.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Hugo -
@schezhugo
I wonder if a more stable, long-term incentivized mechanism could make sense. Something like: - Art is "minted" as an ERC20 but with a more "linear" custom price curve attached to it. - Early buyers get a share of future trades together with the artist. This way you get deeper liquidity and less dependance on virality (while still allowing for a bit of it), which in turn makes it less risky for people to "invest" thus broadening the collector base. You could even have the ETH pool earn yield and be that distributed back to collectors. You wouldn't be trading you would be investing Any thoughts?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
