Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Am I the only one triggered by the tech talk. As soon as we step out of our tiny bubble nobody knows wtf we are saying. “Frames V2? What was V1? Should I care? What did I miss? Damn the crypto bro stuff is confusing.” We can do better. We have to do better. Let’s try to get a general consensus on naming around frames v2. I’ve proposed calling it Frame Technology. eg Devs build apps using Frame Technology. Or Farcaster Frame Technology & mini-apps (not a fan of calling a teams work mini but one battle at a time). There must be naming gurus here? What say you? kmac stfu is also valid response
3 replies
4 recasts
11 reactions

Carl Gustaf 👨🏼‍💻 pfp
Carl Gustaf 👨🏼‍💻
@0xbob
I agree, when you are pitching just frame in general it’s even then very hard for people to grasp and after 30 sec I’ve already lost them. I just learned if I refer them as mini apps they are with me for 30 seconds more at least 😂 This might be my pitching skills that needs some work too 🫣
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
This mirrors my experience. If the recipient isn’t tracking I’ll say something like, ‘ever play a game or use a bot in a messaging app?’ then they get to a-ha but yeah only for a 30s.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction