Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vern
@vern
Looked at this two years ago and found the marketing around JS contracts being “easier” a bit misleading. They introduced some new and unintuitive concepts in the runtime that I found extremely confusing and unhelpful. Solidity is easier to read and write imo. For cosmos, personally a lot more bullish on cosmwasm
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ ツ
@kmacb.eth
Thanks for sharing that. Kinda reminds me of algorand’s marketing around a python implementation. Sounded GREAT until diving in.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
vern
@vern
I remember that, PyTeal! I think teal / avm was just way too low level and restrictive for devs. No fancy wrapper was gonna make it comparable to writing solidity. Do checkout Tealish though, it’s a newer and much more readable wrapper around teal / avm https://tealish.tinyman.org/en/latest/
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Carl Gustaf 👨🏼💻
@0xbob
Algorand is actually going native Python very soon. @kmacb.eth you meant PyTeal or native Python? Either way more people involved like @algofamily knows what’s up more with this but looks like the implementation looks good. I’ve personally always loved Solidity.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
MJ
@algofamily
There is already PyTeal, Tealish, REACH (Javascript syntax), TEAL script (typescript), but we're getting real Python next month. (And another surprise language later this year) @kmacb.eth @vern @0xbob The hope is to onboard web2 devs with Python.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
