0x4b1d

@0x4b1d

54 Following

93 Followers

0x4b1d pfp

Who do you think is the best one to delegate to

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0x4b1d pfp

So bad that I was OOO last week and missed all the voting recently. 😂

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0x4b1d pfp

Thanks for the info, i will try to join the calls 😄

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

0x4b1d pfp

Thank you so much for your explanation! I will dig more into it!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0x4b1d pfp

Can someone explain to me how does Nouncil works? And how to check the historical discussion of Nouncil? And why people delegated their Nouns to Nouncil, are there any onboarding process? New here just got lots of questions.

2 replies

0 recast

6 reactions

Simon de la Rouviere pfp

Simon de la Rouviere

Went behind the veil of the recent trend of social LLM agent owning crypto wallets, diving into history and potential future. What is old is new again. Enjoy! From Social LLM Agents with Wallets to Self-Owning Forest Deodands: https://sceneswithsimon.com/p/from-social-llm-agents-with-wallets

2 replies

8 recasts

19 reactions

0x4b1d pfp

New to this community. Love to support open source projects and hopefully people can use GPLv3 license for their projects.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

0x4b1d pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

If we decided on using client incentives, we should at least stay consistent with it. The only stat that really matters here is whether anyone is actually using the client, and that comes from onchain client incentive records, which I don’t see mentioned in this proposal. If no one’s using Nouns Terminal, what’s the point of funding it further? And if they are using it enough, aren’t the current rewards doing the job? If they’re not, shouldn’t we be looking to increase the incentives instead of just reverting back? We put nearly a million into Verbs this year, and as far as I know, the only thing they’ve fully delivered is client incentives, which, if this is the outcome, seem pointless.

3 replies

1 recast

4 reactions

0x4b1d pfp

Can you please send me the 25ETH prop? I thought the project was never been funded before. open source license issue is very important here too.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

three9s pfp

0 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

0x4b1d pfp

It seems that they have a small tg group talking about all these behind the scenes.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

If you’ve ever listened to them, you’d get it. When someone starts comparing a DAO to a web2 startup, or all their examples are web2, it’s obvious they have no clue about web3 🤦‍♂️. They’re stuck seeing crypto as just tech, not a culture or movement. These people have either already ditched values like decentralization, ownership, transparency, trustlessness, inclusion, community governance, interoperability, and public goods, or they will 🚩. Because those aren’t their values. They’re just hunting for product market fit and a way to cash in on the tech 💸.

0 reply

2 recasts

4 reactions

three9s pfp

Keep Nouns permissionless, forever. Vote at https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/662

0 reply

3 recasts

5 reactions

Spencer Perkins pfp

Spencer Perkins

@spencerperkins.eth

The DUNA proposal represents a pivotal moment for Nouns. I want to emphasize that DUNA and arbitrage are separate issues and should be evaluated independently. We don’t need DUNA to address the potential arbitrage from the fork. I believe that non-DUNA Nouns has the potential for a more exciting, impactful, innovative, and unstoppable future. Whatever the outcome, at least it’ll be entertaining 🍿. https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/662?tab=description

0 reply

3 recasts

19 reactions

Wilson Cusack pfp

This prop makes me sad. https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/662 But I know many thoughtful members support, so I want to understand. It makes it feel like the Foundation has been the main thing for Nouns and we need to find a new way to facilitate that action. Whereas I see the Foundation as a historic artifact. I worry that the Nounders abundance of caution on such things has harmed the DAO in the past. If you support this, what’s the main reason?

3 replies

22 recasts

130 reactions

Lulu pfp

Active participation, transparency, and solid communication are the real ways for an onchain community, like a Nouns DAO, to move forward.

1 reply

1 recast

9 reactions

0x4b1d pfp

Can’t agree more on everything you said

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

If we lose decentralization and self-sovereignty, we're just slapping a fresh coat of paint on a broken system. Real progress means breaking those structures, not dressing them up with shiny chains.

0 reply

1 recast

9 reactions

0x4b1d pfp

Can’t agree more.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction