0age
@0age
What does "chain abstraction" mean to you? Is it being able to move between chains with very low friction? Is it completely hiding the specifics of which chain you're using? Or is it leaning into the distinction, but letting you use one chain to trigger actions on another one? I have my take; curious to hear yours
0 reply
8 recasts
41 reactions
Jeff Lau
@jefflau.eth
#2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Aditi
@adeets-22
there seems to be two different ways to think about this 1) crypto should be fully abstracted from the user 2) crypto should be at the forefront of the experience I believe it is a combo of the two: https://x.com/adeets_22/status/1795481408955363606
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
✿ Gil Alter ✿
@gilalter.eth
Think of chain abstraction like having a VIP pass to all the blockchain parties. No more hassle switching networks - It’s like having a universal remote for your crypto life.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Goksu Toprak
@gt
(First time hearing the term so might be way off) Feels more about whether or not chain is backing the system being abstracted away. On the other hand — "multi-chain" or "chain-agnostic" feels more aligned to "move between chains".
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Joel Cares
@joel
#1 and #3. Abstracting away asset bridging and cross-chain messaging but still giving me clear indications of which chain I'm interacting with and allowing signatures from a wallet that doesn't require any context switching. Not personally interested in #2.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Illia
@bloodytalk
nice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
