Purple
Purple is a DAO whose goal is to proliferate and expand the Farcaster protocol and ecosystem. https://nouns.build/dao/base/0x8de71d80ee2c4700bc9d4f8031a2504ca93f7088
scottrepreneur pfp
2 replies
5 recasts
31 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
2 replies
1 recast
8 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
1 reply
1 recast
12 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
2 replies
4 recasts
12 reactions
shoni.eth pfp
8 replies
1 recast
27 reactions
shoni.eth pfp
5 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
shoni.eth pfp
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
Luciano pfp
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
KMac pfp
3 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
Jacque(she|her) pfp
6 replies
7 recasts
31 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
2 replies
3 recasts
8 reactions
Luciano pfp
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Jacob pfp
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions
scottrepreneur pfp
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions
links 🏴 pfp
Personally I think re-running the retrofunding round with a less game-able mechanic would lead to a better outcome. Manual disqualification (DQ) can cause bad vibes in legitimate builders pretty easily, especially since the rules are changing 1-2 days before the end of the round. Why? It's harder to come up with DQ criteria than you might think. Will they check amps AND noice? Will they count only paid likes or both likes/recasts? What about someone who has 100 likes and only 5 of them are paid? What about someone whose cast was amped by someone else? Each of these is pretty arguable, and the nature of the game means you need to do the DQ criteria in secret and that lends itself to bad vibes IMHO. I've been on the receiving end of that manual DQ process many times. I arrive in a new community, pumped up and ready to contribute only to be told my contributions aren't worth anything compared to "trusted contributors". It sucks. 1/3
4 replies
6 recasts
18 reactions