Data
Let the data discussions flow- onchain or offchain.
FrodoG 🔵 🎴 pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
based pfp
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
D. Mattrenggana🎭 pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
D. Mattrenggana🎭 pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Samo pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
limes pfp
5 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions
Erik pfp
7 replies
2 recasts
22 reactions
Wise 🔵 pfp
3 replies
6 recasts
10 reactions
Devin Conley pfp
2 replies
2 recasts
4 reactions
MarcoV pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
s5eeo pfp
Interesting (contrarian?) read from one of the founding engineers of BigQuery. A paragraph that gets at the heart of the issue is this: “An alternate definition of Big Data is “when the cost of keeping data around is less than the cost of figuring out what to throw away.” I like this definition because it encapsulates why people end up with Big Data. It isn’t because they need it; they just haven’t bothered to delete it. If you think about many data lakes that organizations collect, they fit this bill entirely: giant, messy swamps where no one really knows what they hold or whether it is safe to clean them up.⁠” He acknowledges that this doesn’t apply generally but it does most of the time. Any thoughts? https://motherduck.com/blog/big-data-is-dead/?utm_source=hackernewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=fav
1 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions
Fibo / Scryptoguy 🎩🍖Ⓜ️ pfp
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
Fibo / Scryptoguy 🎩🍖Ⓜ️ pfp
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jtgi pfp
0 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
Sarcophagus pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction