Climate
We’re here to discuss the climate emergency: Solutions > Problems. Building > Politics. Systemic change > Lifestyle change. Emotional processing welcome. No climate denial allowed. Request membership: DM @schulkin something you've posted about climate.
kripcat.eth pfp
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

allenbarth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

allenbarth pfp
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Eric Platon pfp
1 reply
1 recast
17 reactions

Sean Wince 🎩 pfp
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Sean Wince 🎩 pfp
4 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

kripcat.eth pfp
Hazard Reduction Burns are a staple tool of fire management in Australia, usually over winter when burns can be kept cool, slow and controllable. It's an immense and complicated task since essentially all indigenous vegetation in the most populated region of Australia (South East) is pyrophytic. However we're running into an unfortunate problem where the number of days suitable to conduct hazard reduction burns is decreasing because of more frequent days winter days with higher temperatures and/or higher windspeeds as a consequence of Climate Change. Which puts environmental planners in a difficult spot because if you do a planned burn and it gets out of control, that's obviously not good. But if you don't do enough hazard reduction that's also not good and compounds year on year leading to catastrophic events occurring anyway. I expect this will be a worsening problem for all fire prone regions going forward.
4 replies
1 recast
6 reactions

Tito - Air Miner pfp
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Patrick Atwater pfp
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

I. Christwin〔▸‿◂〕💡 pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Brent Schulkin pfp
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

kripcat.eth pfp
4 replies
8 recasts
17 reactions

‿ pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Patrick Atwater pfp
"Because Biden has already issued a major disaster declaration for the Los Angeles fires, unlocking critical aid for the response and recovery, Trump could try to punish California by reversing the order. That would be an unprecedented move that would almost certainly be challenged in court, said Daniel Farber, a law professor at UC Berkeley. Federal law gives sitting presidents the power to issue a disaster declaration but does not spell out if they can retract one, Farber said. “I don’t think that ever occurred to Congress that that would be an issue.” He noted that the statute’s purpose was to dispense disaster aid “orderly and efficiently” — so a president reversing a previous administration’s declaration “would really undermine the whole premise.”" https://calmatters.org/environment/wildfires/2025/01/trump-los-angeles-fire-aid-newsom/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sean Wince 🎩 pfp
3 replies
1 recast
3 reactions