onchain data, onchain community. See the latest community updates and spotlighted data casts

Main

bytexplorers

Want to join a community of crypto data experts who learn and earn together?

Mint your bytepass directly from this frame, join our telegram, and then explore the community members and quests in the linked dashboard 😁

Want to join a community of crypto data experts who learn and earn together?

Mint your bytepass directly from this frame, join our telegram, and then explore the community members and quests in the linked dashboard 😁

https://bytexplorer-frames.vercel.app/api

suggestions on where to find open data sets with github ID and EOA/FID mapping?

reposting here for any tips https://warpcast.com/sahil/0xbb92e3f8

Would love to track the hyperliquid L1 <> Arbitrum <> BASE bridges. 

Is this available anywhere to look at?

Data

Errr wait so how am I/mods supposed to discover good new potential channel members? They need to dm us or we need to just happen to see their casts in another channel?

does anyone have insight on how blob data encoding works on arbitrum and base/optimism? do they have any docs that show how they end up with something like this? https://storage.googleapis.com/blobscan-production/1/01/c8/b9/01c8b924fc972e9d23d46e71478cbbc20a2263d3599e89904a1900f80fdc64af.txt

cc @msilb7 @hildobby

Don't remember if I shared: Publicized my logic to ~approximate duplicate/spam activity (input to ~likely sybils)

Why open it up? Encourage more open models, so we can progress & stop people from using "active addresses"

Still messy, but you can see ideas: https://dune.com/queries/3783798

NOTE: Not for production

data @ op labs, building @optimism 🔴✨ | go /gators 🐊  | casts are my own things | msilb7.com

Was looking into Solayer and liquid restaking on Solana today, and 2 things surprised me 
1/ >90% SOL staked are native stake 
2/ Altho Marinade (mSOL) is still growing a lot in TVL, @jito is absolutely dominating in growth and now takes up 50%+ marketshare in SOL Staked in LSTs

Why is that?🤔

Also curious to see we have similar stats for restaking on Ethereum/EigenLayer already?👀 cc @eekeyguyy @yulia @tomwanhh 

Shoutout to chad @ilemi for the charts🙏

Developer Relations @dune.eth 🧙🤝 | community(openness, crypto) = web3 data | Tinker about human existence ✨🤖⌛🔁

TIL MM swaps is doing more fees than Base.

Can someone help me make a dune, or link me to one that already exists, of the onchain products produced by ConsenSys and Coinbase? eg Linea and/or MM swaps vs Base fees/rev, unique wallets, txn count, etc.

Will tip if this becomes a bigger dashboard that someone creates from scratch.

Devcruiter; 100+ placements (crypto+ HFT). Now, iterating on @interestedfyi to help you find crypto /jobs. Ex @ConsenSysMesh

who’s got the best API for address clustering? 

ie: for a given address return addresses very likely owned by the same person (based on transfer patterns)

What is the typical duration that users keep their bridged funds on Layer 2 solutions before moving them back to the Ethereum mainnet?

https://x.com/optimismgov/status/1828148006950183132?s=46

💫 ZK Rollups are constantly innovating to reducing their L1 gas spend! 

Last week on Aug 21, @scrollzkp's Darwin upgrade went live. It uses single aggregated proofs for multiple batches and eliminates the need to finalize each one individually. 

As you can see here,  we can observe a massive drop in daily ZKP (zero-knowledge proof) verification spend (in ETH) below. 

Note: L1 gas spend for Scroll consists of three parts 1/ proof verification 2/ data availability and 3/ proof hardware. Part 1 for proof verification consumes the most cost.

Scroll isn't alone—ZkSync Era, Linea, and Starknet are all innovating to reduce fees for users via bundling, parallelization and more. The future is more affordable on-chain activity! 💫

- Reference query https://dune.com/queries/4017703/6763457?sidebar=none
- Dashboard on ZKP Verification https://dune.com/nebra/zero-knowledge-proof-verification-cost-ethereum
- Post on Darwin Upgrade https://scroll.io/blog/proof-recursion-scrolls-darwin-upgrade

"Staking Activity on DEGEN"

If I asked you to build dashboards for this, would it be accurate? Or not? I bet a lot of the time, it would be wrong.

Here's why.

If you wrote your query to show staking activity on DEGEN, there is a chance your data is wrong if you started with the assumption that "Deposit function on xyz contract = Stake".

EXAMPLE

If you browse the MasterChef contract on DEGEN, all of the tx functions are simply "Deposit" or "Withdraw".

And, if you analyze the txns correctly, (nearly 100% of the time) the tx classification is either "Stake" or "Unstake".

Deposit = Stake
Withdraw = Unstake

Straightforward, right? Wrong.

The attached example shows a tx with the "Deposit" function, which would normally be classified as "Stake".

But, if you analyze the tx correctly, the classification is "Claim Rewards".

See the problem?

Wrong Classifications = Wrong Dashboards

Is Solana all wash trading? Volume there and specifically on pump.fun are outrageous 

Good for them I guess. Just seems hard to believe

anyone have an example oapps (layerzero)? and know if it is connected to their DVN at all? Trying to track cross chain messages from different providers and can't find any layerzero examples lol.