aichannel
practical ai news, tips, takes, wips, reviews, stories, and Q&A from the front lines of the ai unfolding.
nicholas 🧨 pfp
2 replies
0 recast
16 reactions

xR0am | tip.md pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Jason pfp
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Scott Werner pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Paul Cowgill pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sean pfp
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑ pfp
2 replies
0 recast
25 reactions

Preator pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Victor pfp
0 reply
1 recast
7 reactions

Yakuza pfp
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions

shoni.eth pfp
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Lee pfp
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Jason pfp
2 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

xR0am | tip.md pfp
My workflows changed drastically in the last 9 months and it got me thinking more about the evolution of work. @naval once said, "I would love to be paid purely for my judgment, not for any work. I want a robot, capital, or computer to do the work." With frontier LLMs, this vision is materializing. We’re no longer micromanagers—we’re orchestrators. The shift is profound. The analogy of becoming "a PM for an LLM" captures it perfectly. Our role isn’t to dictate steps but to define goals, trust the system, and refine direction. The agents handle the slop (the 80% of repetitive tasks) and elevate output to senior-level quality (95%) through deterministic loops. This isn’t just efficiency—it’s a philosophical reimagining of labor. When execution is automated, what remains is the uniquely human: creativity, strategy, and judgment. But it demands a leap of faith and I find myself taking it more and more these days, especially as a solo builder. Happy to hear your take.
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Catabolismo pfp
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions