Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
I think we’ve generally gone in the wrong direction in pursuit of inflated metrics, more mints should be $30 rather than 30¢ People don’t value things that are “free” and the true fans are willing to pay anyway
4 replies
1 recast
23 reactions
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
zora's argument is that a viable secondary requires $300/1200 shares. this actually feels quite healthy, but few want to collect more than 1 share (also double tap was built for collecting 1 share lol). A better version of the current experiment would've been to keep mint prices the same but give collectors multiple editions so they could experience a liquid secondary firsthand. They went way too hard on the double tap experience
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
alex
@alexgrover.eth
most people in the creator economy outside of crypto (eg selling courses, physical artwork etc) price things closer to the 100 ppl x $100, rather than 2000 ppl x $5, which makes sense because it’s hard to get to that scale Interesting that NFTs are trending in the opposite direction
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomu
@tomu.eth
$30 won't solve it imo. it's more a brand change, both zora and rodeo are social posts, not selling art anymore
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam
@skineo01
Exactly. I make a mint of my art and it has to be under $1 for anyone to mint it. That is disappointing. I have actually hand drawn art I offer as 1/1 NFTs with the RWA attached…I have those for higher prices but no bites. Our AI art has to be cheap which dilutes to value of the creative process. It would take the majority of artists to decide that we want to raise the price of our art. I doubt I need to explain the economics of how taxing it can be to create art.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
