Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/presto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zach pfp
Zach
@zd
There's been some discourse about "fair launch tokens" and their use for funding long-term projects. Here are my thoughts on the topic: 1. Comparing token launches as a fundraising mechanism to venture capital is missing the point. People who launch tokens often can't or don't want to raise venture capital, and thus the economics of the team vs. community allocation should be fundamentally different. You should give away *far* more of the fair launch token supply than you would give away equity for a venture-backed company. Different entities need different fundraising mechanisms.
3 replies
4 recasts
10 reactions

Zach pfp
Zach
@zd
2. One of the biggest reasons that community builders don't capture the value they create is because the incentives aren't aligned between themselves and the community. They give away all of their time in exchange for creating community value, but they don't capture it because there hasn't been a way to effectively align short-term cash flow needs with long-term upside. If you can give these community builders cash flow while also helping them retain ownership of a piece of the total network value, you can solve this problem.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Zach pfp
Zach
@zd
3. Some people claim that low liquidity favors early traders but screws over everybody else. These people have never worked on long-term projects before. Low liquidity is a feature, not a bug. This is why VCs are locked up, and why founders describe VC-backed companies as 10-year journeys. By having low liquidity, you incentivize longer term thinking instead of early cash grabs.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions