Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Zach pfp
Zach
@zachterrell
should I still read thinking fast and slow despite the replication issues
4 replies
0 recast
23 reactions

secondie pfp
secondie
@secondie
No I'll literally summarize it in one cast. Neoclassical models fail to account for irrational decision-making by individual actors. Here are a couple of new models that relax utility-maximization assumptions by including a new variable to capture different ways individuals get "utility" beyond price. Okie ur done
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

six — f/arcon ↑ pfp
six — f/arcon ↑
@six
imo no, 2010s pop nonfiction is dead and also not lindy
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

greys ↑ pfp
greys ↑
@les
if you want some new naming conventions that can help with mapping behaviors with software in different ways yes. Regardless of “hallucinations” has great observations of human decisioning.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Leo 🎩🔵 pfp
Leo 🎩🔵
@hyp
It's good to know about all these biases and meditate on them in your own life. Feel the direction, if not the specifics.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction