Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
genuine question: why? why β€œhonor” me this way compared to any other way?
17 replies
38 recasts
174 reactions

πŸ“‘   🌘 πŸ€‘ πŸŒ’   πŸ›°οΈ pfp
πŸ“‘ 🌘 πŸ€‘ πŸŒ’ πŸ›°οΈ
@zachharris.eth
@ted I feel like there should be an evident domain feature from a deployment perspective where anybody who is using your likeness without consent would be forced to split their fee rev share / alpha allocation with the associable individual brand @dish is there a multi sig feature on the road map?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction