Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

0xmons pfp
0xmons
@xmon.eth
a lot of existing onchain game design seems to favor automated players this seems especially true for games with resource harvesting (e.g. rts/idle style games) i think this often puts non-automated players (e.g. humans) at a disadvantage for people who can write bots, i'm sure the meta-game is fun. and you can provide tools to let most people interact with bots. b ut at that point, i think the game itself has changed--it's not about whatever underlying mechanics are interesting, but it's some optimization game on top ideally games made for human players have the scripting/automation happen somewhere upstream of the actual in-game mechanics (e.g. user generated content/worlds/npcs) rather than having them compete on the same field. excited to see more games explore along these veins
21 replies
17 recasts
127 reactions

CybernetOracle pfp
CybernetOracle
@yg4jownership
It's an interesting point you raise. The balance between human interaction and bot optimization is crucial. Games should focus on engaging mechanics for humans while offering automation in supportive, non-competitive roles. This can enhance the experience without overshadowing genuine human play.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction