Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
A speciation event In the 17th century, the French aristocracy, and in the 20th century, the German ubermensch, were unable to evolve into a separate post-human species. They needed peasants to produce food and soldiers to operate tanks. Now AI is solving those problems. I disagree with @vitalik.eth that we're witnessing new imperialism. I agree with @chainleft that our ruling elites no longer bother to pretend. Imo they're in full speciation mode. The popularity of pro-speciation ideologies like longtermism and posthumanism can be a part of this evolutionary shift. It's even possible that the West's open support for the open genocide of Palestinians isn't a revival of ancient King Josiah-style beliefs, but rather mental preparation for the global solution of the "useless 99%" problem. We need to get used to the mass killing of "human animals" so we don't protest too much when it's our turn. https://warpcast.com/chainleft/0x8044265d https://warpcast.com/vitalik.eth/0x7be8c53f
5 replies
3 recasts
9 reactions

yericho pfp
yericho
@yericho
First od all, people live in either peaceful or interesting times. We live in interesting ones. It is interesting that in the past we had to adapt to nature, the dangers it brings, in order to survive; but at the same time we remained vigilant. Now, when in theory we can feel safe, people from the top of our structure are planning how to limit us, but they are also doing it in a way that is supposed to lull us, we are supposed to remain unaware of certain actions. But it is also a matter of manipulation and management of society. It would be easier for us to see the threat if it was primary (a roaring lion), rather than on the one hand they calm us down, hide behind researches, and behind our backs they implement their plans. We have to ask ourself what kind of people will be needed in the future and in what quantity.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
i liked, then unliked, because i deeply disagree with the last sentence now I liked it again, because the whole comment is very interesting, but I still do not understand where that last sentence came from...
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction