Cryptoart

Thinks out loud via /epr, forms ideas via paragraph.xyz/@epr , asks questions in /cryptoart, & talks crypto on pods.media/rising-tide

No, it doesn't, but the whole $ before art has been distilled within the cryptoart community since day 1. 

It's why A LOT of trad artists dislike the space. It's purely 'artist as commodity' scenario. 

Remove $ first in conversation is a good start.

Do you agree or disagree with @gtsewell that the reason a lot of trad artists dislike the space is because it's being driven by "artists as commodity" mindset?

ɹǝpunuʍop ɯoɹɟ ɯƃ  ▪︎  /unfk /dxp ▪︎  𝙵𝙾𝚄𝙽𝙳𝙴𝚁: @oshi  ▪︎ 

Art-on-the-Blockchain since 2017

An artist, researcher, and technologist.
Inspired by how affect and systems shape each other. 
Most of my work lives here → epr.net

Blockchain has a transparency quality that makes money trails and incentives visible. Yes it's ugly. But it's basically just the same as in the trad world where everything is just as ugly, orders of magnitude larger, but demurely hidden from sight. 

This applies not only to art but finance as well.

Invisible Gardener. Regen practices. Degen research. Building StatelessDAO open source co-ops. Pixeloodles & Degenomemetics:  https://zora.co/@invisiblegardener

you bring up a good point. it does, i think, make it more transparent than the traditional art world though. so how can artists both take advantage of the transparency and also maintain a healthy relationship with the transactional side of things?