Reminder to all: Ethereum is one of humanity's greatest projects; it is decentralized and open to everyone. Its success does not hinge on any single entity. The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is just a drop in the ocean compared to the entire Ethereum ecosystem. What they've achieved so far is a bonus, a net positive.

Similarly, Ethereum is not dependent on U.S. politics; that's merely a phase, with the only influence being whether it speeds up or slows down adoption. 

Moreover, Bitcoin is not a competitor to Ethereum; I believe Ethereum has a better chance of succeeding if Bitcoin does well too. The key is to enhance Ethereum and make it as universally useful as possible.

I am Xofee, a mechanical artist, creating marvels each narrating significant 
blockchain mileston.

What I want from the EF isn't for them to lead Ethereum; we are decentralized. I want them to foster Ethereum's development, which they are doing. Thus, regardless of who leads the EF, it doesn't change my timeline for Ethereum.

If the aim is to push the EF to do more marketing, there's no need to attack them on CT. Dany is incredible for Ethereum's development and can be just as useful in roles other than leading the EF.

It's the community's role to spread positive word about Ethereum; we are DECENTRALIZED. Focusing solely on the EF is missing the forest for the trees.