adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
Question for fc devs: Anytime we want to use any farcaster client that’s not warpcast, we have to sign a transaction to authorize that client to cast on our behalf and/or edit our profile. How come warpcast doesn’t need to ask permission?
6 replies
1 recast
10 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It’s not a requirement. It’s just how people have it designed today for practicality / speed of implementation. cc @woj.eth
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
it is a requirement, unless i don't understand what we are talking about
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you have a signer you don’t need SIWF. Auth != write access You could onboard a user, set up signer and auth in the future with email.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
ah yes but @adrienne is specifically asking about the permission to cast or edit profile supercast (which adrienne recently onboarded on) asks for a signer approval only after you attempt writing to the protocol
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
And if signer approval is always a requirement, and there’s so other work around, why doesn’t warpcast need signer approval? In the future, would be good to force this to be true to protocol neutrality. And instead of authorized signer, could I one day authenticate using my farcaster wallet to show proof of ownership?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

antimo 🎩 pfp
antimo 🎩
@antimofm.eth
cc @0xconca.eth remember you were wondering about this when we set up @hyperclient.eth (the delayed signer approval)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction